Tagged: world weariness

Kiss Me Deadly (1955)

"Why don't we make a deal. What's it worth to you to drag your considerable talents back to the gutter you crawled out of."

“Why don’t we make a deal. What’s it worth to you to drag your considerable talents back to the gutter you crawled out of.”

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0048261/

Dir: Robert Aldrich

Runtime: 106 mins

Let’s get one thing straight, Kiss Me Deadly is not a very nice film.

I’ve no idea how much of this made it past the censors, but maybe at 1955 they took one look and simply gave up.

If there was ever a piece of cinema that gripped you by the throat and throttled you until your bones rattled here it is.

Based on the book by billion-selling author Mickey Spillane, it’s a schlock pulp insane noir masterpiece.

Ralph Meeker is wonderful as the seemingly indestructible Los Angeles private eye Mike Hammer, it was a role he could never top.

Hammer is one of the most unlikeable anti-heroes you’re likely to meet, such to the extent you cant take your eyes off him.

He’s a nasty, blackmailing double crossing lowlife, but the people he cheats, beats and exposes are even worse.

How can you not love a guy like that?

Describe this movie in four words and many give you “cheap piece of shit” but look again and you’ll find a golden slice of cinema that has been as influential as any of its time.

There are no nice guys, the lighting and shadows are visually among the moodiest and harshest of the time, and the film itself is a jarring experience. It’s a film that doesn’t want to be our friend.

Of the plot, Hammer picks up a hitchhiker he sees running in the road, and then runs into trouble as a gang of thugs chase and eventually knock him out.

He winds up in hospital, corpses, including that of the hitchhiker start to rack up, and his cop friend tells him to back off the case.

A series of twists and turns takes us to a friend of the dead hitchhiker, the beautiful Lily Carver (Gaby Rodgers), and we are introduced to a mysterious box that could contain anything from a fortune to the secrets of the universe to an unknown force that could destroy the world. “The great whatsit” they call it, and everyone wants a slice.

It becomes the centre of Hammer’s world, we know it’s hot to touch and it glows.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out the Cold War connections and the nuclear connotations, but the briefcase containing the unseen item has been ripped off from Repo Man, Ronin, to Pulp Fiction to endless other films.

All in homage though, none do it better than this.

I’d say there’s even a touch of early John Waters in here, the screen reeks of raw cheapness, and where today’s films are so slick they push you away here the grime gets into your skin.

So, can Hammer keep hold of the box, and stop whoever gets their paws on it from exposing the potential horrors, or riches inside?

It’s an explosive ending in more ways than one, but the entire film is an incendiary powder-keg waiting to erupt.

Kiss Me Deadly is a dark and filthy noir that has does everything in its power to reach in and tear out your gut;  it has science fiction, post-apocalyptic doom, cynicism and a nihilism that few films have ever matched.

Don’t watch it if you want something that will put you in a good mood.

Do watch it if you want to experience a searing, fatalistic journey into noir’s heart of darkness.

Pickup on South Street (1953)

"Sometimes you look for oil, you hit a gusher."

“Sometimes you look for oil, you hit a gusher.”

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0046187/

Dir: Samuel Fuller

Runtime: 80 minutes

Genuine class from Warner Brothers, and a star turn from Richard Widmark.

He oozes sleazy charisma as three-time busted pickpocket Skip McCoy, a bum who dips in to one coat too many and winds up on the Government’s hit list.

It’s a fairly simple plot, as McCoy picks the purse of Candy (Jean Peters) he also unwittingly lifts a confidential top-secret microfilm that was being passed on by the woman’s consort, a Communist agent.

A police informer drops McCoy in it, and Candy does what female spies do best – tries to seduce him in order to get at the goods.

But like the viewer Candy becomes smitten with the cheeky thief and falls in love with him, failing to get the film back.

It’s not long before the heavies are on McCoy’s tail, and yet he still isn’t quite sure why.

He holds all the cards, even if he doesn’t realise just how big the stakes are, but how long can he hold out?

Widmark’s anti-hero is very special and would be a career defining role for most other actors, as he absolutely kills the part.

He’s a smirking, fast-talking con with big “who? little old me” eyes that dart around with a fiery intelligence.

There are actors who could talk out of the side of their mouths and convince you their lips were still, and Widmark is like that, he has the shifty patter down to an art.

Cinema was changing in the 1950s and here you can feel it; he is as criminal, and yet there is sympathy.

A lot of the characters we get behind operate on the wrong side of the tracks, and it is the genius of the director Sam Fuller that he pushes boundaries so far.

The Commie Red angle is given to us in full as the Cold War was heightened during this time, and America would have been very touchy, but there are aspects of character on show that would never have made it past the censors 10, or even five years previous.

We’re thrown into a world of liars, cheats, stoolies, thieves, the real pits of New York’s ends, and we love them.

It has all the snappy dialogue you’d expect from people living at the bottom with only their wits to guide them, and with Fuller directing his own script he gives it absolutely everything.

As expected Widmark has the best lines in the film but there are two wonderful female actors on show.

Thelma Ritter plays the seen-better-days informant Moe Williams with a brutal honesty.

Noir viewers are so accustomed to seeing either dashing, innocent wives or lusty femme fatales it comes as something of a (welcome) surprise to see such a key part given to an older woman.

She wears a hangdog expression throughout and her eyes are full of sadness; she’s no plot wallpaper and it only adds to the strength of the film having secondary characters who feel real.

And of course there’s Jean Peters as Candy.

Like Rita Hayworth, Lauren Bacall, Gloria Grahame and so many others, it is this writer’s belief that the black and white screen makes female stars more beautiful than colour ever could.

She radiates trouble, charm, and natural beauty as the dopey girl sucked into a dangerous world of spies and thieves.

A great wonder of Pickup on South Street is the film seems to run on this charm; the quirky characters make everything move, and while there is a MacGuffin driving things all we really care about is the people.

Unusual use of close ups, very effective lighting and strange camera angles are cleverly used, and there clearly wasn’t much money floating about, but what a ride it takes you on.

Fuller gives some wonderful views of New York and makes the city seem the stuff of fantasy, it is cinema gold.

That is the beauty of film noir; The Big Combo was nowhere and at the same time everywhere, shot almost entirely in shadow, and Pickup on South Street can only be New York, but both lock us in to their dark and claustrophobic worlds with expert direction and cinematography.

This film is a gem, it rarely gets a mention on lists but is, no punches pulled, a mini masterpiece.

 

Gilda (1946)

" Gilda, are you decent?"

” Gilda, are you decent?”

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0038559/

Dir: Charles Vidor

Runtime: 110 mins.

I struggled to pick an image that would do this film justice and not seem a cheap ploy to drag you in with promise of titillation, but when you’re dealing with one of cinema’s most beautiful and desired sirens it is almost impossible.

In the end Rita Hayworth plays Gilda and all else is secondary.

There is a film in there somewhere, but you’ll lose any inclination to go digging the moment she makes her entrance, the likes of which audiences had never seen, or will ever see again.

Gilda is off camera when we hear her speak for the first time, there is a flick of that flowing hair and she springs into the frame whispering “Hello boys”.

The silver screen was never the same again.

It’s the scene which the prisoners in Shawshank Redemption are watching when they howl with wild delight.

Noir directors loved to toy with us before they played their ace; look at Barbara Stanwyck’s tantalising entrance in Double Indemnity.

They want us slavering in expectation at what we might find, and from the moment Gilda appears we are all cast under her spell.

Glenn Ford’s Johnny Farrell is the unlucky man who gets in between her and her shady casino boss husband Ballin (George Macready).

It turns out that even vanishing to a dirty hole in a far flung corner of Argentina isn’t distance enough for the the washed-up crook Farrell, who knew Gilda in a previous life.

The fated triangle noir plays out with the former lovers who hate each other so much they fall in love over again.

We know only too well that messing with a seductive temptress like Gilda can only mean doom.

Farrell ends up running the casino following Ballins mysterious disappearance, and bags himself the ultimate prize.

But there are few winners when the game is so filthy, and gambler Farrell may have rolled one dice too many.

It’s a mangle of several other films, think Casablanca mixed with Out Of The Past and you won’t go far wrong, but despite the unoriginal and sometimes creaky plot it has enough stardust to leave it a class apart.

The dialogue is razor sharp, easily among the top bracket of noirs, and Glenn Ford is on cracking form.

He narrates the tale as Johnny Farrell and does an excellent job of not being completely lost in the whirlwind that is Rita Hayworth.

Pardon me, but your husband is showing.

The entire film reeks of sex, and like some of the other riskier noirs there is an undercurrent of homosexual love between Farrell and Ballin.

Gilda announced Hayworth in spectacular fashion, and it is undoubted that the pout, the breathy voice, flashing eyelids and the tousled hair influenced in bombshells down the ages, from Marilyn Monroe to Jessica Rabbit.

It’s a sexually charged performance, and her show-stopping “striptease” to Put The Blame On Mame where she removes nothing but a glove will blow your socks off.

Don’t lose sight of the fact you’ll have seen this copied, parodied, ripped off endlessly, but this is no cliché, it’s the real deal and this was sexuality in a way never shown before.

She actually plays the song twice, the second one almost heartbreaking in its simplicity, but is no less sexy, as she strums lonely at the guitar.

It’s slower, but will bury its way into your head.

As a lovely touch the song also plays in the background when Glenn Ford meets Lee Marvin in The Big Heat.

Hayworth was married to Orson Welles at time of production and although by all accounts it was not a happy affair, his presence can be felt in Gida;  no-one can be trusted, appearances are deceptive and their is a cagey, seedy feeling to the atmosphere, pure Welles.

She wasn’t decent by any means, and she’ll always bear the blame, but Hayworth is a knockout as Gilda and this film is required viewing.

The Narrow Margin (1952)

"Mrs. Neall, I'd like to give you the same answer I gave that hood - but it would mean stepping on your face."

“Mrs. Neall, I’d like to give you the same answer I gave that hood – but it would mean stepping on your face.”

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044954/

Dir: Richard Fleischer

Runtime:  71 mins

Not necessarily a film noir, but not necessarily not. Make sense? Well neither does much of the plot, which centres on a cynical cop (not unusual) sent to protect a key witness (not unusual) on a train (hmm) from Chicago to Los Angeles while playing a deadly game of double bluffs with the mob who are also on board (?). After that all hell breaks loose and no-one is quite who they are supposed to be.

Forget that and instead try to work out why more wasn’t made of Charles McGraw’s class at this time of his career.

There was a book written about him, and his links to film noir, usually as a hood or tough cop, but he doesn’t feature heavily in many to my mind, and they aren’t particularly memorable parts, other than his turn in The Killers.

His role as Detective Sergeant Walter Brown  in The Narrow Margin is wonderful. McGraw had that almost undefinable star quality, and this film is all about his presence. He is a magnet, and his stone-faced, hard-nosed cop is played to perfection.

Going back and watching his earlier films, even in cameos he clearly stands out as someone who had “it”.

I love him in this film, for sheer force of personality (maybe he finally got to stretch his legs and revelled in it) , I doubt anyone except possibly Bogart, could have matched him in this role.

Where Bogart’s world weariness is often reflected in his sad eyes, McGraw’s bleak outlook is seen and delivered through his tone. Into a granite-carved face his eyes are black pools of death which offer nothing. Bogart could certainly spar, but he was rarely as mean.

He and the witness Frankie Neall (Marie Windsor) quickly work out they don’t like each other, and their chemistry ignites what could easily have been a run-of-the-mill crime flick into something special.

His constant telling her to “shut up” after receiving more bile is brilliantly delivered.

Windsor came to be known as the “Queen of the B’s” for frequent outings in fare like this, and rightly became lauded as a legendary actress.

Her caustic replies elicit rapid-fire sniped barbs, and watching the pair of them attempt to break each other down as the plot speeds along is a wonderful example of how small budgets are no barrier to noir directors, who can use all their tricks and ingenuity to ensure that less is always more.

And it is a breakneck plot.  Essentially we have man sent to protect woman argues with her on a train, hilarity ensues.

Is it noir? It doesn’t really have a femme fatale, and our flawed protagonist isn’t really someone we would consider vulnerable at any point. The entire film takes place almost entirely on the train, so we don’t get to see rainy city nights, smoky bars or the wider array of characters or tools that you would normally associate with the genre.

That said there are plenty of low-angle shots, raincoats, the cynicism, and the sheer cramped, claustrophobic nature of the police meets, the train carriages and everything else fit the bill for you list-tickers out there.

Watch it.

And after you’ve watched it (and loved it), and know the spoiler, check out this rare interview with the producer Stanley Rubin.

Detour (1945)

"I was tussling with the most dangerous animal in the world, a woman."

“I was tussling with the most dangerous animal in the world, a woman.”

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037638/

Dir: Edgar G Ulmer

Runtime: 67 mins

B-Movie pulp fare that has a bleakness, a blackness that no noir can match.

Nightclub pianist Al Roberts (Tom Neal) needs to hitchhike from New York to Hollywood to see his girl.

From the moment his fingers finish twinkling the keys at his final stint the rain begins to fall and Roberts’ world begins to collapse.

He picks up drifter Charlie Haskell, and after the man dies in a freak accident Roberts assumes his identity, knowing the cops would never believe him.

Then he makes the truly fatal mistake of picking up Vera (the appropriately named Ann Savage).

Savage puts in a turn as one of the vilest, most vicious women ever filmed. On occasion she resembles a snake, snarling and screeching at Roberts with flashing eyes full of hatred and pity.

She decides to blackmail him, and the fatal net draws in.

It is a grimy, mucky noir that will leave you feeling like you need a shower once you finish watching.

Bad lucks trips Roberts at every turn and his face ages before us, in the end this slightly cynical everyman becomes a weather-beaten husk.

The film was made during the Hays Code era, but the ending can still be interpreted in different ways.

It feels somewhat tacked on and Ulmer later said he hated it and was forced into it.

Despite all this Detour has some of the bleakest dialogue in any film of this nature.

Money: “So when this drunk handed me a ten spot after a request, I couldn’t get very excited. What was it I asked myself? A piece of paper crawling with germs. Couldn’t buy anything I wanted.”

“Money. You know what that is, the stuff you never have enough of. Little green things with George Washington’s picture that men slave for, commit crimes for, die for. It’s the stuff that has caused more trouble in the world than anything else we ever invented, simply because there’s too little of it.”

Fate: “That’s life. Whichever way you turn, Fate sticks out a foot to trip you. Yes. Fate, or some mysterious force, can put the finger on you or me for no good reason at all.”

For sheer despair it is unmatched, critic Rogert Ebert called it “poverty row” and he was right.

The miracle of this film it was shot in six days on a $10,000 budget. That is all Ulmer had to work with and yet he managed to create a minimalist world of guilty, filthy magic.

The cheapness only adds to the beauty and makes the whole thing seem like a crazy dream.

The film was selected for the national archive and has now fallen into the public domain, watch it once and it will stay with you forever.